The Essay Experts Ressaylutions for 2017

The Essay Experts Ressaylutions for 2017 I’ve been encountering a lot of articles lately advising me on the dangers of New Year’s resolutions. Indeed, it has been proven that such resolutions almost always fail, usually because they are overambitious and unreasonable, aiming to chomp off too big a bite at once. For instance, we might say we’re going to start meditating for 30 minutes every day when we haven’t been meditating at all. Or we don’t create the right environment to support the change. We think we can stop checking Facebook messages at night while still sleeping with our phone in our room. Guess what: Real change takes a realistic, one-step-at-a-time mindset and a commitment to actually change something. If you want to stop eating chocolate, it will help not to buy it when it’s on sale at the grocery store. Even better, don’t walk by that section of the store. My trick for getting my new year’s resolutions accomplished is to announce them to the world, and get regular coaching to keep me accountable. I still don’t get all of them done. But I insist that I get more done than if I hadn’t made the resolutions at all. Here’s how 2016 panned out, and what’s ahead for next year. 2016 Ressaylutions Update 1. Infuse my WHY statement throughout The Essay Expert’s website. Success! This one turned into a complete redesign of my site, which is complete. I’ve put my WHY statement on my new homepage, theessayexpert.com, and on our new Why The Essay Expert page. I added more â€Å"why† focused descriptions to my Executive Resume LinkedIn Success Package, Mid-Level Resume LinkedIn Success Package, and Entry-Level Resume LinkedIn Success Package pages too. Every time I write new copy for my website or for a marketing message, I now look for ways to infuse the communication with my WHY. 2. Provide better information on services on my site.†¨ Success! I’ve written better descriptions of my services on my website and am putting the finishing touches on my new â€Å"a la carte† web pages. 3. Serve 250 clients. I refocused instead of expanded, serving fewer clients, almost exclusively at an executive level. 4. Publish 2 new editions of How to Write a KILLER LinkedIn Profile.†¨ One down! I released the 12th edition and prepared the 13th, but chose not to publish it because LinkedIn is about to implement sweeping changes that will make the current version obsolete within weeks. 5. Get How to Write a KILLER LinkedIn Profile in front of colleges and universities. I got the book into many college bookstores, and Barnes Noble agreed to carry 15 copies in its stores. I will be doing a book event at the Barnes Noble in Madison on January 19th! 6. Increase college essay / personal statement portion of my business to 25% of business.†¨ Instead of focusing here, I’ve put efforts into building my executive resume writing business. I continue to bring in college and MBA admissions projects by word of mouth. 7. Find an editor to do some of the editing of resumes and LinkedIn profiles that I’m currently doing. Fail. I interviewed some potential editors and so far haven’t found the right match. I am also seeking someone to help with sales calls and client inquiries. If you know someone you think would be a great resume editor or sales person, please send them my way! What The Essay Expert Is Up to for 2017 1. Launch Writely, a Client Management Portal. The Essay Expert has been using Infusionsoft to send automated emails to clients, and we’ve run into its limitations. Writely will provide a better platform for both clients and the writers at The Essay Expert. All communications and documents will be accessible through a secure portal – something I’ve wanted for years! 2. Find that editor. See #7 above. As long as I am the only editor at The Essay Expert, we are limited as to the number of clients we can serve. I want that to change. 3. Publish a trade edition of How to Write a WINNING Resume. I’m in the final stages of negotiating a contract with Skyhorse Publishing to create a trade edition of my book on resume writing. 4. Publish the 14th edition of How to Write a KILLER LinkedIn Profile, updated with the new face of LinkedIn. I will do this as soon as LinkedIn rolls out its new features (and takes away some too). The question is whether I will release another print edition or just an e-book. If you have an opinion, please weigh in! 5. Write a marketing plan – including SEO enhancements. I have been relying on just a couple of sources for new clients and I need to diversify. I will work with my business coach to write a real marketing plan that I can stick to and build business. I already know that part of the plan will involve SEO so that my Google results improve. I have hired someone to work with me on this project starting next week. 6. Explore the possibility of moving to the East Coast. I’ve been in the Midwest for eight years and I’m feeling like it’s time for a change. As The Essay Expert focuses more on Executive projects, I think a move east could be a good business decision, as well as a positive personal one. Stay tuned! Have you made resolutions for 2017? How are they going so far? Are they realistic or might you want to adjust them so you can succeed? Please share – putting your promise and progress out to someone else creates accountability and makes it more likely that you will stay on track. Here’s to a year of accomplishment and follow-through! Save Save Save Save Save Save

Sterilization in Nazi Germany

Sterilization in Nazi Germany In the 1930s, the Nazis introduced a massive, compulsory sterilization of a large segment of the German population. What could cause the Germans to do this after having already lost a large segment of their population during World War I? Why would the German people let this happen? The Concept of The Volk As social Darwinism and nationalism merged during the early twentieth century, the concept of the Volk was established. Quickly, the idea of the Volk extended to various biological analogies and was shaped by the contemporary beliefs of heredity. Especially in the 1920s, analogies of the German Volk (or German people) began surfacing, describing the German Volk as a biological entity or body. With this concept of the German people as one biological body, many believed that sincere care was needed to keep the body of the Volk healthy. An easy extension of this thought process was if there was something unhealthy within the Volk or something that could harm it, it should be dealt with. Individuals within the biological body became secondary to the needs and importance of the Volk. Eugenics and Racial Categorization Since eugenics and racial categorization were in the forefront of modern science during the early twentieth century, the hereditary needs of the Volk were deemed of significant importance. After the First World War ended, the Germans with the best genes were thought to have been killed in the war while those with the worst genes did not fight and could now easily propagate.1 Considering the new belief that the body of the Volk was more important than individual rights and needs, the state had the authority to do whatever necessary to help the Volk. Sterilization Laws in Pre-war Germany The Germans were not the creators nor the first to implement governmentally sanctioned forced sterilization. The United States, for instance, had already enacted sterilization laws in half its states by the 1920s which included forced sterilization of the criminally insane as well as others. The first German sterilization law was enacted on July 14, 1933 - only six months after Hitler became Chancellor. The Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (the Sterilization Law) allowed the forced sterilization for anyone suffering from genetic blindness, hereditary deafness, manic depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, congenital feeblemindedness, Huntingtons chorea (a brain disorder), and alcoholism. The Process of Sterilization Doctors were required to register their patients with genetic illness to a health officer as well as petition for the sterilization of their patients who qualified under the Sterilization Law. These petitions were reviewed and decided by a three-member panel in the Hereditary Health Courts. The three-member panel was made up of two doctors and a judge. In the case of insane asylums, the director or doctor who made the petition also often served on the panels that made the decision whether or not to sterilize them.2 The courts often made their decision solely on the basis of the petition and perhaps a few testimonies. Usually, the appearance of the patient was not required during this process. Once the decision to sterilize had been made (90 percent of the petitions that made it to the courts in 1934 ended up with the result of sterilization) the doctor that had petitioned for the sterilization was required to inform the patient of the operation.3 The patient was told that there would be no deleterious consequences.4 Police force was often needed to bring the patient to the operating table. The operation itself consisted of ligation of the fallopian tubes in women and a vasectomy for men. Klara Nowak was forcibly sterilized in 1941. In a 1991 interview, she described what effects the operation still had on her life. Well, I still have many complaints as a result of it. There were complications with every operation I have had since. I had to take early retirement at the age of fifty-two - and the psychological pressure has always remained. When nowadays my neighbors, older ladies, tell me about their grandchildren and great-grandchildren, this hurts bitterly, because I do not have any children or grandchildren, because I am on my own, and I have to cope without anyones help.5 Who Was Sterilized? Asylum inmates consisted of thirty to forty percent of those sterilized. The main reason for sterilization was so that the hereditary illnesses could not be passed on  in  offspring, thus contaminating the Volks gene pool. Since asylum inmates were locked away from society, most of them had a relatively small chance of reproducing. The main target of the sterilization program were those people with a slight hereditary illness and who were at an age of being able to reproduce. Since these people were among society, they were deemed the most dangerous. Since slight hereditary illness is rather ambiguous and the category feebleminded is extremely ambiguous, some people were sterilized for their  asocial  or anti-Nazi beliefs and behavior. The belief in stopping hereditary illnesses soon expanded to include all the people within the east whom Hitler  wanted eliminated. If these people were sterilized, the theory went, they could provide a temporary  workforce  as well as slowly create Lebensraum (room to live for the German Volk). Since the Nazis were now thinking of sterilizing millions of people, faster, non-surgical ways to sterilize were needed. Inhuman Nazi Experiments The usual operation for sterilizing women had a relatively long recovery period - usually between a week and fourteen days. The Nazis wanted a faster and perhaps unnoticeable way to sterilize millions. New ideas emerged and camp prisoners at Auschwitz and at Ravensbrà ¼ck were used to test the various new methods of sterilization. Drugs were given. Carbon dioxide was injected. Radiation and X-rays were administered. The Lasting Effects of Nazi Atrocity By 1945, the Nazis had sterilized an estimated 300,000 to 450,000 people. Some of these people soon after their sterilization also were victims of the Nazi euthanasia program. While many others were forced to live with this feeling of loss of rights and invasion of their persons as well as a future of knowing that they would never be able to have children. Notes 1. Robert Jay Lifton,  The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide  (New York, 1986) p. 47.2. Michael Burleigh,  Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900-1945  (New York, 1995) p. 56.3. Lifton,  Nazi Doctors  p. 27.4. Burleigh,  Death  p. 56.5. Klara Nowak as cited in Burleigh,  Death  p. 58. Bibliography Annas, George J.  and  Michael A. Grodin.  The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York, 1992. Burleigh, Michael.  Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900-1945. New York, 1995. Lifton, Robert Jay.  The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. New York, 1986.